HarpWeek
is pleased to present “Citizenship, Due Process, and Equal
Protection: The Creation of the Fourteenth Amendment” as a public
service for students, teachers, and interested citizens.
The end of the Civil War in April 1865
brought defeat to the Confederacy, and the ratification of the
Thirteenth Amendment in December 1865 put an end to slavery in the
United States. Serious questions remained, however, concerning the
fate of former Confederates and the newly freed slaves in the
restored Union. The Fourteenth Amendment was an attempt to provide
some answers to the troubling and shifting situation in the early
postwar years. Its creation took place within the context of
concerns over the mistreatment of blacks in the South, the
reelection of ex-Confederates to political office, and the struggle
between President Andrew Johnson and Congress over the control and
content of Reconstruction. The novelty, complexity, and flux of the
period were reflected in the development of the Fourteenth
Amendment, which had its origins in distinct constitutional and
legal remedies to address the disparate problems of civil rights,
the apportionment of federal representation, punitive measures
against ex-Confederates, and the public debt of both the Union and
the former Confederacy.
The HarpWeek website:
- begins with President Johnson’s
Reconstruction program;
- continues with the search in
Congress during the winter of 1865-1866 for ways to secure civil
rights in the South;
- follows the course of the
Freedmen’s Bureau Act, the Civil Rights Act, and the Fourteenth
Amendment to passage in Congress (including the first
congressional override of a presidential veto in the adoption of
the Civil Rights Act of 1866);
- depicts the intensified violence
in the South manifested in the Memphis and New Orleans race
riots;
- notes the collapse of the
working relationship between President Johnson and Congress,
including the president’s National Union Convention that August,
his disastrous campaign tour, “Swing Around the Circle,” in
September, and the crucial congressional elections in November
1866, which gave Republicans veto-proof majorities to control
the Reconstruction process;
- describes Southern resistance to
the Fourteenth Amendment and the congressional response in the
First Reconstruction Act of March 1867, which mandated
ratification before a former Confederate state could be
represented in Congress again;
- and concludes with ratification
of the amendment in July 1868.
The Fourteenth Amendment
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make
or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state
deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction
the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states
according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number
of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when
the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for
President and Vice President of the United States,
Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers
of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied
to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one
years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way
abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime,
the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the
proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to
the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in
such state.
Section 3. No
person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or
elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office,
civil or military, under the United States, or under any state,
who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress,
or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any
state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any
state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall
have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or
given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by
a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized
by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and
bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion,
shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any
state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid
of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any
claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such
debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate
legislation, the provisions of this article.
The primary source materials for this
website are taken from the pages of Harper’s Weekly, the
leading American illustrated newspaper in the second-half of the
nineteenth century. The items include editorials, feature stories,
news items, illustrations, and cartoons. Of special interest are
the news briefs in the “Domestic Intelligence” column under the
subheading, “Congress,” which give readers today a unique
opportunity to follow the proposals, counterproposals, debates, and
votes in Congress on the major issues of the day.
In addition to the primary source
material, HarpWeek has added an annotated timeline, biographical
sketches of significant players in the creation of the Fourteenth
Amendment, and a glossary of terms.
Historian Robert C. Kennedy selected,
organized, and wrote commentary for this website. Greg Weber and
Richard Roy provided the technical skills to make it function
effectively on the Internet.
If you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact Robert Kennedy at
rkennedy@harpweek.com.
John Adler, Publisher
HarpWeek
 |